[bisq-network/compensation] For Cycle 9 (#463)

[Riccardo Masutti]

> > [bisq-network/bisq-website#324](https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq-website/pull/324) | 3750 BSQ
> 
> @RiccardoMasutti Could you provide some background why a font change caused so much effort (3750 BSQ)? I am not familiar with the webpage code but if such would be done for the Java app it would be a realtive small task.
> 
> Please stay up to date with upcoming discussions/decisions how we bring the expense/revenue balance back on track. We have to check all expenses for their value regarding trade volume growth. Would appreciate your input and contribution in the discussions there....

Hi chimp1984, thanks for your interest.
I'm actively following compensation balance thread and I agree with you that in the previous cycles a lot of of people took advantage of the DAO, demanding more than would have been fair.
This must be changed and all the stakeholders should vote more carefully. 
Although it is only my second cycle, I realized that it is more important today than ever.

Regarding my request, as you can see, PR 324 is the one where I asked for the most. That's because I really worked hard on it and spent lot of hours to analyze privacy leaks in the website, to analyze anonymized user sessions via Matomo (device, browsers, etc.) to make sure that this change does not detract from support for our users, apply and test the modified source over different browsers.

Also, I'm not going to request a single BSQ for the same changes in the docs repo.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/compensation/issues/463#issuecomment-574363438
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20200114/1bbc8414/attachment-0001.html>