[bisq-network/compensation] For Cycle 9 (#470)

wiz notifications at github.com
Tue Jan 14 23:21:24 UTC 2020


> Such changes should be discussed more up-front. Is it really crucial for Bisq (specially in current low volume situation) to have 6 BSQ explorers?

@chimp1984 Well, my compensation request above doesn't include any BSQ explorer hosting charges, only the development work, but the BSQ explorer roles were expanded to 2 maintainers and 4 operators as part of [DAO proposal 143 to decentralize BSQ explorers](https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/143), which I believe you approved.

But I do appreciate Bisq's current financial situation and to help support the project I'd be happy to waive my hosting fee for the BSQ explorer going forward, as it doesn't use much server/network resources. I will also consider how to cut other infrastructure costs.

<img width="682" alt="Screen Shot 2020-01-15 at 8 00 01" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/232186/72390290-b2dcd000-376d-11ea-90e9-897840d60280.png">


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/compensation/issues/470#issuecomment-574420465
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20200114/8ee73cb6/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list