[bisq-network/compensation] For cycle 9 (#469)

[MwithM]

> They are two articles that although the objective was the same, they are different.
> I think it's a good job.

Morocotacoin's piece was retweeted and It had more reactions than usual, so I agree it's a good job. They're not different. It's the same piece on two different webs. Let's see the text one next to the other: 

![comparación](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/50149324/72419033-4b7a4c80-377c-11ea-8f7d-c96391b2d818.png)

As first time enthusiast contributors, I overlooked this and didn't want to say anything. But do you really still defend they're different articles?

Do you really think Bisq should spend almost 400 BSQ for this?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/compensation/issues/469#issuecomment-574561396
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20200115/c8bf9a38/attachment.html>