[bisq-network/compensation] For cycle 9 (#469)

MwithM notifications at github.com
Wed Jan 15 09:00:12 UTC 2020

> They are two articles that although the objective was the same, they are different.
> I think it's a good job.

Morocotacoin's piece was retweeted and It had more reactions than usual, so I agree it's a good job. They're not different. It's the same piece on two different webs. Let's see the text one next to the other: 


As first time enthusiast contributors, I overlooked this and didn't want to say anything. But do you really still defend they're different articles?

Do you really think Bisq should spend almost 400 BSQ for this?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20200115/c8bf9a38/attachment.html>

More information about the bisq-github mailing list