[bisq-network/proposals] List new Confidential Asset L-BTC pegged 1:1 to BTC on Liquid (#169)

Chris Beams notifications at github.com
Fri Jan 17 15:05:15 UTC 2020

At the risk of being repetitive, I'll just weigh in here saying that this is a good example of a proposal where we have broad (indeed unanimous) consensus on a proposal, so there is no need to go to a DAO vote.

We want to put things to a formal vote as infrequently as possible. The ideal number of DAO votes on proposals (other than parameter changes) is zero. Only when we are truly at an impasse, where there are two or more options on the table that have been thoughtfully discussed and cannot be reconciled, should anything like this go to a vote. Voting on anything contentious creates losers and likely resentments. Getting to rough consensus by making good arguments, thoughtfully disagreeing, etc builds respect, cohesion and harmony. I talked with Wiz about this the other day and he understands and agrees; I just want to re-iterate it here because we could probably all use a refresher on this principle.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20200117/b60214b6/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the bisq-github mailing list