[bisq-network/proposals] Concerning the refund agent system (#236)

[Peter at Clearwater-Trust.com]

I like this proposal.  However, the problem remains.

How does this eliminate the need to review ALL OF THE REIMBURSEMENT REQUESTS to correct "clerical" errors?

How can we eliminate the "error" of double charging the DAO like you attempted to do?
Do we have to pay somebody like wiz to birddog the reimbursement requests? 
How do we make it better? 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/236#issuecomment-661040302
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20200720/4dffebcf/attachment.html>