[bisq-network/support] Reimbursement for double refund payout (#461)

[sqrrm]

I will accept this request as I think it's an essential task of the DAO. The mistake is part of a bad structure and going forward it looks like we will have to do the reviews and voting through the DAO for each larger refund, an extra cost that we have so far avoided.

If this is not accepted it sends a signal to contributors that they should not assume any personal risk as they can see that the DAO won't be there to support them in bad times. That, to me, sends the wrong signal to contributors in general.

The refund agent has taken on perhaps the least rewarding role with the highest personal risk within the bisq DAO. Who would be interested in continuing this work after a rejection of this request?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/support/issues/461#issuecomment-665726441
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20200729/a2d00397/attachment-0001.html>