[bisq-network/bisq] Trader chat messages time stamp wrong (#3325)

[sqrrm]

I don't think adding partial ordering by introducing replyTo is worth it, especially since it's not guaranteeing ordering anyway. I think setting a local timestamp as messages are received is more reasonable and would at least order messages the way they were read by the receiver.

I would not consider this high priority. The issue with nullptr exception seems more urgent to fix as it could precent communication rather than just shuffle the order of messages.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/3325#issuecomment-645290109
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20200617/82620fa7/attachment.html>