[bisq-network/proposals] Replace the role of Refund Agent with a new team of Arbitrators that can together publish one of several pre-signed 2 of 2 multisig timelocked payout transactions as proposed by a Mediator (#220)

Peter at Clearwater-Trust.com notifications at github.com
Sun May 10 16:41:39 UTC 2020

In this proposal, a team of 3 of 5 arbitrators is required to make the payout. 

Why are we using 5 and not the number x = total amount of individuals dealing with trade failures?

Separating this workgroup is not necessary. (Mediators/Arbitrators) They should all have the same privileges and be equally invested in ALL trade disputes. 

x being the total number of mediators/arbitrators required to run all of Bisq’s markets. Or 2 of x. Or 5 of x. I don’t know.

Within the workgroup they can designate who will be available to review and sign eachother’s payouts in the event of a trade failure.

Why are you trying to separate this workgroup? Why did you make it 3 of 5 in the proposal?


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20200510/83e084be/attachment.html>

More information about the bisq-github mailing list