[bisq-network/proposals] Request to take over the Bisq donation address - burningman3 (#221)

[burningman2]

I confirm that we agreed to re-use the address for @burningman3.  The reason is that traders (buyers) who have disabled the DAO would reject sellers (at address verification) as the new address has to be added to the release (hardcoded) in case the users is not using the DAO (its only visible for DAO enabled nodes). Even after the next release it might take a bit until most users have updated to make sure that nearly no trades will fail because of that. A failed trade would result in lost trade fee for both buyer and seller.

So the process will be that we add @burningman3's new address to the list of hardcoded addresses for verification, then wait some time until most users have updated and then @burningman3 will make a DAO param change request with his new address. In the meantime he will get the private key of my current address so he can use that.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/221#issuecomment-629577167
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20200515/5cbd5a1c/attachment.html>