[bisq-network/bisq] standardize tense in trade process wording (#4262)

James Cox notifications at github.com
Sat May 16 23:15:07 UTC 2020

NACK.  I can see that the tense does not match, but really don't think the original wording is so bad it justifies a change.  

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20200516/f6eb9ab0/attachment.html>

More information about the bisq-github mailing list