[bisq-network/bisq] standardize tense in trade process wording (#4262)

[James Cox]

NACK.  I can see that the tense does not match, but really don't think the original wording is so bad it justifies a change.  

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/4262#issuecomment-629718154
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20200516/f6eb9ab0/attachment.html>