[bisq-network/bisq-website] Add cycle 12 results blog post (#368)

[Chris Beams]

@cbeams approved this pull request.

ACK, with the assumption my one suggested change makes it in.

> +
+GitHub admin ([link](https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/210){:target="_blank"}); Domain name owner ([link](https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/212){:target="_blank"}); DNS admin ([link](https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/213){:target="_blank"})
+
+_Accepted_
+
+These proposals were for _cbeams_ to post bonds for the roles listed above.
+
+**Repay victims of the April 2020 security incident using BTC trading fees**
+
+Generic proposal ([link](https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/209){:target="_blank"})
+
+_Accepted_
+
+This proposal specified a framework for paying back the 6 victims from [the April security incident](https://bisq.network/statement-security-vulnerability-april-2020). Funds will be paid back as quickly as possible from BTC trading fees. A [filter-based mechanism to distribute repayments](https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/4150) is currently under review, and a basic [reporting mechanism](https://github.com/bisq-network/support/blob/master/track-repayments.html) to track payments has also been devised.
+
+Notably, this proposal _did not_ specify whether the total repayment would be the USD value of the funds at the time they were lost, or if the total would be the BTC total of the funds lost. This point remains to be addressed in a separate proposal to be submitted for consideration in Cycle 13.

```suggestion
Notably, this proposal _did not_ specify whether the total repayment would be the USD value of the funds at the time they were lost, or if the total would be the BTC total of the funds lost. This point remains to be addressed in a separate proposal to be submitted for consideration in a subsequent cycle.
```

The separate proposal has not yet been put together for Cycle 13 and won't be done in time. This doesn't matter much as the filter implementation isn't even merged yet.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq-website/pull/368#pullrequestreview-413511691
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20200518/53c96dfa/attachment-0001.html>