[bisq-network/proposals] Replace burningman and refund agent by market place based solutions (#259)

[chimp1984]

I think the problem is the increased risk and increased cost. If any offer I make is at risk to end up burned if the peer is not cooperative or a newby who does not understand Bisq, or just lazy if small amounts, I would think very carefully before adding an offer. And if the deposits is then 100% we make it even harder.
The competition use free-of-cost and in practive low risk features. Privacy is a asset what some people are willing to pay for extra but there are limits and I fear that MAD with 100% deposit is just too expensive for a large enough group of traders to form a market. 
We might try it out with new payment methods where there is no other option (Cash by mail), but I don't expect big success with that...

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/259#issuecomment-727078133
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20201113/b2d01d8d/attachment.html>