[bisq-network/bisq] Improve UI/UX for account aging column in 'Offers' section of GUI (#4735)

[pazza]

Thanks @m52go that was all useful to know.

> I understand the desire to clarify chargeback risk, but I'm not sure we should do that.

Thanks, I agree it does seem to put a negative impression of a potential trade. 

> * Trading with a signed account simply makes it much more likely that you'll have a smooth experience. It might also make it much more _unlikely_ that you will have a bad experience, but that is a different claim, and (in my opinion) not a wise one to make.

I agree trading with a signed account makes it much more likely that you'll have a smooth experience versus trading with an account that requires signing that is not yet signed.

However trading with a signed account will likely be just as a smooth experience versus trading with an account that does not require signing.

> * With that said, account signing is only applied to the most risky payment account types in the most active Bisq markets...so risky account types in less active markets don't require signing _even though_ they're still risky.

Yes this is a good point. I had not considered that.

> * To twist things even further, there are also risky payment account types in active Bisq markets that don't require signing in order to bootstrap their liquidity (e.g. Australian PayID).

Thanks, I was not aware this was the case.

> As a result, I suggest leaving out the chargeback assessments and just mentioning signing status.

Agreed.

> Perceived safety may not be as clear in this way but I'm not sure if there is a way to accurately convey it without misrepresenting. People just need to understand what signing is, what it signifies, and why it's only applied to certain payment methods in certain markets.

Thanks I agree. I also this the perceived safety should not imply signed accounts are less risky than accounts that do not require signing. I think this can be fixed with the 🗹 mark. 

How about:

**For accounts that do not require signing**

Text to show 'This account was created x days ago, and does not require to be signed.'

eg

195 days 🗹 'This account was created 195 days ago, and does not require to be signed.'
0 days 🗹 'This account was created 0 days ago, and does not require to be signed.'

**For accounts that require signing**

Text to show:

'This account was created x days ago, and has not been signed yet.'
'This account was created x days ago, and is waiting x days for limits to be lifted.'
'This account was created x days ago, and was signed by a peer x days ago.'

eg

195 days '🛈' 'This account was created 195 days ago, and has not been signed yet.'
195 days 🕜︎ 'This account was created 195 days ago, and is waiting 27 days for limits to be lifted.'
195 days 'tick badge' 'This account was created 195 days ago, and was signed by a peer 193 days ago.'




-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/4735#issuecomment-727265853
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20201114/5798a5cb/attachment.html>