[bisq-network/bisq] Add "Cash by mail" as a payment option (#1101)

[pazza]

> I am in favor of trying it out as well. But I guess a higher security deposit it the only option to make it a bit more safe and we should make clear that mediators are unable to make a judgement. They still could try to help, but both traders need to be aware that in conflict situations there is no "judge" and funds stayed locked up forever or are donated to the DAO in case one publishes the delayed payout tx.

I think in a low percentage of cases they will not be able to make a judgement.  In the majority of cases I am sure it will be clear who they would side with based on the evidence presented.  No need for funds to stay locked up forever. They can just be sent to the arbitrator where one side does not accept the mediator's proposed solution. 

In the rare cases where their the mediator cannot make judgement then the funds can go to the arbitrator. The funds can then be burned by burning man. Both parties can then submit a proposal for reimbursement from the DAO in BSQ by and provide their evidence. Unless new evidence was presented at this stage it is unlikely either party would get their funds back.

It can be handled the same way F2F trades currently are. I do not think their is much more risk, but just more volume, so more potential for CBM trades to end in mediation than F2F trades.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/1101#issuecomment-727683368
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20201115/dc01fbe7/attachment.html>