[bisq-network/bisq] What new payment methods would you like added to Bisq? (#4757)
pazza
notifications at github.com
Mon Nov 16 04:22:16 CET 2020
I have just put together a list of requirements to consider when adding new payment methods.
Currently their is not documentation around what does / does not make a good payment method so this is my attempt to share my current thoughts as to what should be considered when adding new payment methods.
The idea would be when evaluating a payment method against the requirements if it can meet at least all essential requirements it can be added to Bisq.
If a payment method had any definite no's it would be unable to be added to Bisq.
It is a work in progress at the moment and it would be great to have peoples comments.
If you think I have missed anything, or included something incorrectly please let me know.
| Essential | Desirable | Definite Noâs |
| ------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------- |
| Very low risk of chargeback | No risk of chargeback | < very low risk of chargeback |
| Way to identify counterpartyâs payment | Ability to enter Trade ID as reference | No way to identify counterpartyâs payment |
| Trade time less than one week | Instant payment | Trade time more than one week |
| Singular Fiat currency | Multi-currency | Not a payment method for fiat currency |
| Significant user base | Large user base | No significant user base |
| High usability | High usability and great user experience | < high amount usability |
| No KYC required | Allows users to trade with upmost privacy. Minimal identifying information as possible (no names, email, phone etc required) | Some KYC required (proof of address, ID, selfie) |
| Low risk of scam attempts | Trades are as safe and secure for as many users as possible | < low risk of scam attempts |
| Traders can provide evidence of payment / receipt | Verification of payment can be made using PageSigner or similar | Traders will be unable to provide evidence of payment / receipt |
| Minimum limit at least equal to at least account limits protocols | No minimum limits | Minimum limit not able to achieve account limits protocols |
| Maximum limits equal to at least 0.01 BTC | Large payment limits > 2 BTC | Maximum limit is less than 0.01 BTC |
| Likely to increase liquidity | Likely to open markets for different countries and currencies | Likely to decrease liquidity |
| Low risk of mediation | Very low risk of mediation | < low risk of mediation |
| Low risk for traders from government agencies | No risk for traders from government agencies | < low risk for traders from government agencies |
| Fees should not be a barrier to trading | No fees for transactions | Fees will be a barrier to trading |
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/4757#issuecomment-727711700
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20201115/484d7484/attachment.html>
More information about the bisq-github
mailing list