[bisq-network/proposals] Connect traders and contributors more closely by extending the fee model (#280)

[m52go]

Lots of excellent ideas in this proposal. I agree with a lot of what's been said here. 

One thing I might suggest is starting with a small number of initiatives we know that fees are likely to be enough to fund (and that users would find attractive). I don't think it's realistic to have all high-priority Bisq work funded solely through fees right now. 

Furthermore -- from a user's perspective, opting to pay more and not seeing the initiative you wanted fully funded is discouraging. Then from a contributor's perspective, there are a number of details we need to figure out, so maybe limiting this mechanism to a small number of initiatives makes sense as we refine the social processes behind it (implement it fully, all 3 phases, but only apply it to initiatives/milestones we know can be funded).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/280#issuecomment-728730200
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20201116/3dd87747/attachment.html>