[bisq-network/bisq] Adopt fee model to de-incentivize offers with huge market price distance (#4630)

[chimp1984]

> > The longer an offer stays online without being taken the more aggregated resources it consumes.
> 
> A variant of the above idea to address this point from @chimp1984 : how about making the trade offers "time bound"?
> 
> Meaning, if an offer is not taken after let's say 1-2 weeks, the offer "expires", and maker fee is lost.
> 
> (If an offer is online for more than 1-2 weeks, its unlikely the trader will be responsive to evtl move his trades forward and confirm the steps, in case the offer is accepted. So some sort of upper time limit makes sense from that perspective as well.)

I was thinking on that as well, but I guess that has even more potential negative effect in low volume markets. There can be legitimately offers with good price and nobody takes it. We have to be thanksful for those market makers to keep their offers and must not punish them. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/4630#issuecomment-707320324
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20201012/13b5008e/attachment.html>