[bisq-network/proposals] Properly define trade limits (#264)

sqrrm notifications at github.com
Mon Oct 19 22:27:34 UTC 2020


> _This is a Bisq Network proposal. Please familiarize yourself with the [submission and review process](https://docs.bisq.network/proposals.html)._

<!-- Please do not remove the text above. -->
The current state of affairs when it comes to trade limits isn't perfect, an example is https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/4482

I have looked through the code and I'm still not 100% sure what limits we have in all cases, but I've started refactoring the code to make it understandable. I would then like to set limits that are reasonable, easy to follow in the code and also update documentation.

My current understanding of fiat limits

#### For non risky methods, time after account creation and signed accounts that are selling, time after signing
0-30 days: 0.25 * MAX_LIMIT = 0.0625 BTC
30-60 days: 0.5 * MAX_LIMIT = 0.125 BTC
\>60 days: MAX_LIMIT = 0.25 BTC

#### For signed accounts that are buying, time after signing
<0 days: 0.01 BTC
0-30 days: 0.01 BTC
30-60 days: 0.5 * MAX_LIMIT = 0.125 BTC
\>60 days: MAX_LIMIT = 0.25 BTC

### Proposal
I suggest that we change it to
#### First case
MAX_LIMIT no matter the age. That means 0.25 BTC trade limit for all non risky methods immediately and selling for risky methods.

#### Second case
<0 days: 0.01 BTC
0-30 days: 0.01 BTC
\>30 days: MAX_LIMIT = 0.25 BTC



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/264
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20201019/273714bd/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list