[bisq-network/proposals] Properly define trade limits (#264)

MwithM notifications at github.com
Tue Oct 27 20:54:23 UTC 2020


Would aging still apply to small fiat markets, where signing isn't required?

Except face to face and and other cash based methods, is quite hard to know if there's no chargeback risk at all. For those and alts, aging doesn't make much sense.

Also, I think that if just after signing buy limits would double to 0.02 btc it would increase likeability to go through signing process and make effects of signing more evident to newcomers.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/264#issuecomment-717532843
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20201027/c54363ab/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list