[bisq-network/proposals] Properly define trade limits (#264)

m52go notifications at github.com
Wed Oct 28 01:01:39 UTC 2020


Overall this sounds great. Should help reduce market fragmentation, increase trade sizes, and encourage sellers to sell.

> Would aging still apply to small fiat markets, where signing isn't required?

Also wondering about this. Assuming account signing will eventually be implemented for buying with high-risk payment methods in any new market, does it make sense to impose aging limits during the bootstrap phase or not? I'm not sure.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/264#issuecomment-717630138
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20201027/067e62dd/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list