[bisq-network/proposals] Features which would require/benefit from a Bisq hard fork (#267)

Christoph Atteneder notifications at github.com
Thu Oct 29 08:44:05 UTC 2020


I think those are all great ideas to improve Bisq, even if it requires a hard fork. But I think the bigger threat that is slowly approaching are the rising mining fees, that might make Bisq not feasible anymore for small trades. I do know that we ran into a dead end with the off-chain protocol, but I guess we have to put all our brainpower to alternative solutions sooner than later.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/267#issuecomment-718485519
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20201029/2415e2e8/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list