[bisq-network/proposals] Properly define trade limits (#264)

[pazza]

> > *would be interesting to see data from a full year. Not sure is this has been published anywhere?
> 
> See "Most common payment methods" in [this post](https://bisq.network/blog/trading-trends-august-2020/).

Thanks, that link is not working for me? Also has Trojan pop-up?

> > I would be a proponent on making all fiat accounts have a signing mechanism. I think this would increase buyer confidence.
> 
> Really? The general sentiment is that signing is a necessary evil. Is lack of signing the reason you avoid Faster Payments?

Yes, when buying BTC seeing the seller is using a signed account gives me more confidence. I like seeing the little tick on the badge! This along with with the seeing a good account age of increases my confidence about the person I am buying off. 

Yes, the increased confidence I have when trading with signed accounts means I prefer to use SEPA and Revolut payment methods. I avoid Faster Payment. 

Might adding signing to Faster Payments increase trading volume? 

What do you see as 'evil' when it comes to account signing?

> > Thanks can you point me to where these are well documented? I had trouble finding clearly defined vision and values.
> 
> Perhaps [this wiki article](https://bisq.wiki/Introduction) helps?

There is no mention of vision or values in the introduction. It does nicely define the mission though, but a mission is not a vision :)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/264#issuecomment-719168483
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20201029/0da543d6/attachment.html>