[bisq-network/proposals] Properly define trade limits (#264)

[pazza]

@sqrrm thanks for explaining the reasons why signing can be disruptive and cause problems with privacy. All makes more sense now.

Is signing not a form of "Don't trust, verify."?  Trades using a signed account have at least been verified by one other user as having matching account details. It also demonstrates that they have at least completed one successful trade. In a perfect world signing would proves that the user's given account details are correct. 

Trades from users using accounts that do not require signing cannot be verified in any way prior to trading. 

>Having said that, aged accounts could get some similar UI feature to show they are old enough.

This would be good 👍 

For new users Bisq can be a scary place to trade. Some changes to the UI would make it less so. Even a simple thing like showing account age in the offer column for payment methods that do not require  signing would help. This is done for payment methods that require signing.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/264#issuecomment-719546417
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20201030/4cce583a/attachment.html>