[bisq-network/proposals] Properly define trade limits (#264)

[chimp1984]

> #### Account aging
> 
> 0-30 days old: 0.25 * MAX_LIMIT = 0.0625 BTC
> 30-60 days old: 0.5 * MAX_LIMIT = 0.125 BTC
> >60 days old: MAX_LIMIT = 0.25 BTC
> #### Account signing
> 
> unsigned: 0.01 BTC
> 0-30 days since signing: 0.01 BTC
> 30-60 days since signing: 0.5 * MAX_LIMIT = 0.125 BTC
> >60 days since signing: MAX_LIMIT = 0.25 BTC

I think we should remove the limits for methods where no signing is used (and only account age is used). We have seen with the SEPA chargebacks that the account age is not sufficient anyway, so why should we keep it as protection when it has failed already and only cause friction for new users. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/264#issuecomment-719651214
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20201030/02450033/attachment.html>