[bisq-network/proposals] Scheme for locked funds with non responsive peers (#275)

[chimp1984]

The number of transactions would only increase in the event that it will be used, otherwise they are just signed not broadcast txs... 
I just wonder if the scheme can fit in to the existing protocol without need for new roundtrips. Any new message added increases a bit risk and slows a bit down the process, so better if we can avoid that. 
Maybe you can try to start sketch out which peer is the preparing part and the finishing part and which holds the fully signed tx and when and if its needed to share it back to the other peer.
With the delayed payout tx and deposit tx this is an important part to avoid blackmail risks and avoid that there can be cases where no delayed payout tx is shared. We need to ensure that here as well as otherwise it opens up ways to abuse it. We need to be able to verify the txs which are a chain of txs, so it comes with some complexity needed to be sketched out more in details.

Once we see that its feasible to add to the current protocol we should think about how we implement it from a UX perspective. As its an exceptional case I would prefer to not confuse users with it as long its not needed... But thats another field we should get a bit deeper. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/275#issuecomment-719658601
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20201030/087fc9f8/attachment.html>