[bisq-network/proposals] Replace burningman and refund agent by market place based solutions (#259)

[MwithM]

> No. The seller has a claim which is at most what was sent to the burning man (the balance depends if the other trader also gets some payout). The DAO thus reimburses at most what was sent to the burning man. To introduce an inconvenience reimbursement will lead to many possibilities of gaming and negotiation hassles.

Refund agent needs to take profit from his activity to exist. Now it's you, a trusted party, and it looks like your activity is not profitable ennough (you charge the equivalent in BSQ to 50USD per case + 1% per advanced BTC funds to be reimbursed in BSQ). 
If this activity is open to the market, or the profit for refund agent is taken from the protocol violator deposit fund, or we could see the market taking advantage from the DAO and fake dispute cases.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/259#issuecomment-695967090
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20200921/833c8319/attachment.html>