[bisq-network/proposals] Add negative score for protocol violations (#260)

cd2357 notifications at github.com
Mon Sep 21 16:47:23 UTC 2020


> Let's talk about incentives, which is what Bisq should be relying mostly on, instead of reputation:
In certain cases, it's hard to say that a protocol violation is affecting negatively to the other part. I probably would like to take lots of offers where I receive full amount of a +20% security deposit from an unresponsive seller, specially if I receive it in 13 days.

Fully agree.

Maybe Bisq could allow both low and high security deposits, then just highlight the ones with higher deposits in the overview? Maybe sort them closer to the top in the market overview, or mark them as safer / lower risk? This would incentivize takers to prefer them, and sellers to offer them, while still not alienating those who prefer smaller deposits.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/260#issuecomment-696236435
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20200921/d5e38cb8/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list