[bisq-network/proposals] Add negative score for protocol violations (#260)

chimp1984 notifications at github.com
Mon Sep 21 18:11:43 UTC 2020


I agree with the concerns. Lets focus then first on improvements in various areas. Dispute agents need to act more according to clear guildelines. There are too many cases where not responding traders get back their deposit. I don't understand why, that is destroying the incentive structure of the security deposit if you get it back even in severe protocol violations.
We still have about 10-20 refund agent cases. those are still way too high to delegate reimbursement completely to the DAO. As it is not the RA delegates only the high amount cases and that gets already a bit too much for the DAO, specially with mediation/RA summary notes not in the quality to make an informed judgement. 
So I am totally in favor to focus to fix all those easy problems first before introducing a new tool which depends on trust to mediators/arbitrators.
I still leave it open but I guess from the feedback so far it can  be considered as rejected.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/260#issuecomment-696281708
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20200921/2e51b2b8/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list