[bisq-network/proposals] Bisq 2.0 - A multi-protocol DEX (working title Misq) (#330)
MwithM
notifications at github.com
Tue Apr 27 10:33:23 CEST 2021
> t seems the volatility risk is not reflected in the trade fees. A highly volatile asset earns the same trade fees but comes with much higher risk for impermanent loss.
Maybe I miss some important difference, so if you are more familiar with those models and automated trading, please add your view on that.
I think I never found anyone complaining about this, but you are right. When trying to provide liquidity for rskswap I knew I would not want to provide for the DOC/RBTC pool but for the BPRO/RBTC pool because of volatility.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/330#issuecomment-827424370
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210427/3700beaa/attachment.htm>
More information about the bisq-github
mailing list