[bisq-network/bisq] reduce BSQ fee estimation constant for segwit (#5450)
sqrrm
notifications at github.com
Fri Apr 30 14:48:18 CEST 2021
@sqrrm commented on this pull request.
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
public static int TYPICAL_TX_WITH_1_INPUT_VSIZE = 175;
private static int DEPOSIT_TX_VSIZE = 233;
- private static int BSQ_INPUT_INCREASE = 150;
+ private static int BSQ_INPUT_INCREASE = 65;
Indeed, so for now I think this is fine. It's also the taker that pays for the whole tx which makes even worse to get an accurate calculation.
Perhaps we should wait with this change and add in the next release when more BSQ utxos are segwit. If included right now it would guarantee to be wrong in the beginning.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/5450#discussion_r623850115
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210430/9cb0920a/attachment.htm>
More information about the bisq-github
mailing list