[bisq-network/bisq] Provide ASIC resistant PoW scheme for BSQ swaps (PR #5858)

[chimp1984]

@chimp1984 commented on this pull request.



> @@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ message Filter {
     bool disable_api = 27;
     bool disable_mempool_validation = 28;
     bool disable_pow_message = 29;
-    int32 pow_difficulty = 30;
+    double pow_difficulty = 30;

Ah ok. Yes then we should not limit it by choosing a int type. What about a long type? Would it hurt anything on the Equihash side? But no strong opinion, just was wondering why a double is used.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/5858#discussion_r762193938
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20211203/cb13680b/attachment.htm>