[bisq-network/proposals] Cap max reimbursement from peers security deposit (#292)

[pazza]

Why not just issue @Akira45-0 with a nominal 1 BSQ that they can sell the the burningman OTC for 2.3 BTC. Essentially burningman pays back @Akira45-0

I still think it the above is messy.

Why cant the refund agent make a refund of over 0.5 BTC, I think the limit was introduced due to a payment being made twice. In that case cant the refund be done using a multi-sig with refundagent1 and refundagent2, therefore, reducing the chance of human error?

I think Bisq should look where possible to refund traders in what they traded vs BSQ. I agree that a free option on BSQ is not to the benefit of BIsq.
 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/292#issuecomment-771294981
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210201/5252a418/attachment.htm>