[bisq-network/proposals] Cap max reimbursement from peers security deposit (#292)

[chimp1984]

Maybe @RefundAgent can join the discussion...
I think the limit was introduced to limit volatility risk for the RA. But I agree that at least the risk of abuse as option trade could be avoided in that case. We could calculate the costs for volatility of the past cycle and deduct that from the refund to the trader (or part of it). It would have the benefit for the trader to get faster refunded and with less hassle. And the RA can manage to keep volatility risk lower if trade with BM happens soon after refund so it decreases the time span where volatility causes problems. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/292#issuecomment-771311080
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210201/be4988b1/attachment.htm>