[bisq-network/proposals] Cap max reimbursement from peers security deposit (#292)

[MwithM]

Even if the secondary timelocks are implemented, i find that giving a cost for opening arbitration is still necessary.
The main flaw of this proposal was to think that traders are getting a reward too high when it's a percentage of the deposit, so it's relative to trade amount.
The valid reasons to put a price to arbitration is to internalize the costs of opening it, make Bisq profitable and deterr fake dispute cases created by refund agents.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/292#issuecomment-772277890
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210202/36ca0d1a/attachment.htm>