[bisq-network/bisq] Make some trade simulation functions re-usable (#5128)

[Stan]

> utACK
> 
> A bit odd indeed with the atomic function to perform the full trade, but it does what it should in this case.

I wanted the calling scripts to be simpler.
I broke various protocol steps into their own functions -- `waitfortradedepositpublished`, `waitfortradedepositconfirmed`, `waitfortradepaymentsent`, etc. -- in the next PR.  That made `executetrade` a little smaller, but still atomic.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/5128#issuecomment-772533235
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210203/c568dcb8/attachment-0001.htm>