[bisq-network/proposals] Add delayed refund transactions (#303)

MwithM notifications at github.com
Wed Feb 3 20:21:32 CET 2021


> I am just not sure if the potential reduction of arbitration cases by 30-50% justifies a protocol change and potential trade protocol hardfork with all risks included and as we have seen in the past those changes always caused quite some troubles both with new bugs, security vulnerabilities and loss of trade volume.

I don't think so.
If Bisq takes a part of the security deposit of the unresponsive trader, that would at least cover the cost of arbitration. The risk that burningman creates as central point of failure will exist with or without these cases.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/303#issuecomment-772756351
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210203/567de20a/attachment.htm>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list