[bisq-network/proposals] Distribute BTC fees to contributors of last DAO cycle (#305)

[MwithM]

> What I like on that proposal is that it removes the need for the burningman at least for one part of his role. As the BM is a problematic and hard to solve problem the best solution for such circumstances is to get rid of it completely...

The filter would not remove the need to depend on some anonymous contributor(s) taking care of the donation address.
I find the tradebot (#304) and swaps in general more promising (although they don't get rid of burningman anyway). At this proposal, I find it will be hard to follow spending. It will arise disputes between contributors about who got more BTC, as being compeansated in BTC is more desirable than in BSQ.
The distribution is more decentralized when the burningman burns BSQ bought to traders than using the filter, reducing legal risks.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/305#issuecomment-772777271
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210203/ba4bf129/attachment.htm>