[bisq-network/proposals] BSQ trading fee update on Cycle 21 (#301)

[pazza]

Hi @MwithM 

I am not completely aware of the history to the economics of BSQ or why certain things like caps were introduced but thought I would share some thoughts. 

Would it make sense to align all the BSQ fee rate updates?

- BSQ Trade fees rate
- BSQ Compensation rates
- DAO refund request rates
- Even proposals like [Refund agent buys BTC from burningman with 30 day average](https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/294)

As the price is pretty volatile I think aligning prices, and updating them each cycle, could be of benefit.

I also think having differing caps could cause problems in the future. Aligning prices and removing caps (or standardizing them across the above) might introduce volatility problems but it would also ensure these are at least made fair when compared within the ecosystem of Bisq.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/301#issuecomment-772972377
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210203/fc7249bf/attachment.htm>