[bisq-network/proposals] Cap max reimbursement from peers security deposit (#292)

[Conza]

> ### Seller not responding cases
> As mentioned before we get plenty of those cases and there is no economically ration explaination for those, specially when its high amounts like 2 BTC trades and the loss is 0.3 BTC. But those cases hurt the DAO most as those are the expensive ones and carry the higher risk. We increased the security deposit because of that but seems it did not had effect on that (on future trades it had effect).

Should help somewhat - ignorance has to be the case, got so many trades going etc. No clear notifications at all bringing the issue to their attention: 
[#5097 Add Notification icon for Mediation and Arbitration chat](https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/5097) 
[#5074 Improving trading chat communication](https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/5074): 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/292#issuecomment-773012797
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210203/b41ddb8d/attachment.htm>