[bisq-network/proposals] Distribute BTC fees to contributors of last DAO cycle (#305)

Conza notifications at github.com
Fri Feb 5 01:22:50 CET 2021


> Maybe we should also have a look why traders prefer paying higher BTC fees than using BSQ in the first place. Maybe there is a more easy win to gain by improving these issues.

**There is:** 
- [Improve BSQ account creation & purchase process](https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/5046) #5046
- [Add 'low priority' payment account type to BSQ ](https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/5153 )#5153
- [Add "Buy BSQ" button next to trade fee selector](https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/5055) #5055

I've also recently asked whether BSQ should be considered an 'altcoin' (as it currently dilutes the BUY BTC field, with SELL BSQ options...), as well as in the OFFERS BY PAYMENT section - altcoins on top (in reality, 56 of those are BSQ)... 

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/51952482/106971973-0b7d7180-67a4-11eb-94cc-c3684ee47939.png)

I don't see it as an altcoin. Not sure how it should be treated, but think separated from "BUY BTC" for sure... and have its own category in Offers By payment. 

It's the lifeblood of the DAO, different to a shitty altcoin, and should be treated as such imo. 

Whether that's having a special BSQ market place in-app, I don't know. But certainly all of the above would go a long way to increasing the value of BSQ (lowering all the crazy barriers currently in place for someone new to purchase!)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/305#issuecomment-773692331
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210204/2b70c7f7/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list