[bisq-network/proposals] Distribute BTC fees to contributors of last DAO cycle (#305)

RefundAgent notifications at github.com
Fri Feb 5 02:10:45 CET 2021


Thinking about this proposal I'm lately quite in favor from initial scepticism. This makes Bisq more like a corporation and the stream of BTC is a salary. BSQ is the share and is illiquid because the market cap of Bisq is low. BSQ will only increase in price and trading activity if investors believe Bisq will grow its revenue. Nothing else matters for them. Nothing else.

People don't care about paying their fees in BTC, the fee is certainly not what is limiting usage of Bisq. The only way to incentivize people to use BSQ for the trading fee is to increase the BTC-fee. Certainly not by decreasing the BSQ-fee.
Combining this proposal with a bot that buys BSQ to burn would reduce both the amount of BTC held at central points of control and take away the BM. The bot will also buy smaller amounts of BSQ many times which will improve price discovery on the BSQ-market. It is still not perfect but getting better.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/305#issuecomment-773710657
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210204/599d28c7/attachment.htm>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list