[bisq-network/bisq] Recurring offers to support dollar cost averaging (DCA) use cases (#5165)

[Max Hillebrand]

> Offer publication would become automated, but trade settlement, i.e. paying the seller, would continue to require interaction.

Yes, this is kinda security feature but UX bug... The cool thing about the custodial DCA is that you can literally `set it and forget it`. After setup there is 0 user interaction required.

It seems that this is not trivial, and probably not even desired, to automate the fiat bank transfer for Bisq trades... But notice that then Bisq DCA's have this [quite substantial] UX downside compared to custodial DCA's. Again, automated transfer of fiat certificates might improve that UX a lot, however the security downside might still be unfavorable.

---

Yes, `relative limit offer` is the correct term, `BTFD` is a great feature name though! :laughing: 

I think "publish this offer whenever the market price drops X% `below P market price`" is just a round-about way of a regular offer at price `P`?

 This is what I meant above "publish this offer whenever the market price drops X% `within T time interval`" 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/discussions/5165#discussioncomment-346733
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210207/f17122a2/attachment.htm>