[bisq-network/bisq] Add option to make trade 'reason' less obvious (#2869)

[Conza]

> No. I have missed that. I just can't wrap my head around how a bank would match a reason for payments to Bisq with a regex like: It can contain numerals, or letters and can be separated by dashes or dots or spaces at any position. This must also match every reason for payments ever stated.

I suspect its likely volume that may initially trigger an investigation into an account - but then upon looking into the account, the banks/fintech see's there is a ton of other random numbers/letters transactions to all these other accounts. Super suspect. They then follow the trail and rope in everyone linked. 

There were some that were only given a warning and likely had other transactions NOT with trade ID's but using the service for other stuff. 

Ergo, by NOT displaying the "TRADE ID's" (random letters/numbers) but allowing for "real" / "no" "reason for payments" descriptions, it is ALL ELSE BEING EQUAL assumed to be harder for banks/fintech to assume these are decentralised exchange trade and thus more likely to go unnoticed/not deactivate in bulk. 

Perhaps the volume trades by someone still triggers an investigation but if the response is "services rendered" or something like that, it makes it less likely they can rope in everyone else. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/2869#issuecomment-774803564
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210207/5e6e5bab/attachment.htm>