[bisq-network/proposals] Action Protocol for Mediators (#307)

[pazza]

> > @Conza88
> > > So am I right in thinking that even blatant scammers get some of their security deposit back? To me that makes little sense.
> > 
> > 
> > There has to be some incentive to accept the mediation payout from the 2of2 since it requires the scammers signature. During the refund process nothing should be given back to scammers obviously.
> 
> Kind of confused by this. Any reference to docs would help. My apologies.
> And if the scammer doesn't give the signature? There's just a delay yeah?

My experience dealing with a scammer on Bisq was the following.

Mediator proposed the scammer lose half their security deposit, I accepted, scammer didn't (the trade was for 0.01 BTC with a 0.006 security deposit, mediators cannot suggest anything that leaves a trader with 0.003 BTC or less) this is to incentivize them to accept rather than going to arbitration.

Trade went to arbitration. Scammer did not respond to arbitrator. I was awarded all their security deposit. 

So all in all a positive experience.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/307#issuecomment-778701722
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210213/15880edb/attachment-0001.htm>