[bisq-network/proposals] Reduce by half the min and max BTC limits to adjust fiat BTC price increase. (#295)

[Conza]

> I agree that individuals should be able to set their own terms, but when using a platform like Bisq they have to adhere to defined rules. You could take it a step further and say that users should be able to choose the trade fees they pay, or the trade window etc, but it would be chaotic and difficult to manage, and would not be in the best interest of Bisq.

Haha, fair enough. Adds complexity. Suppose part of service and customer experience is via protcol/process and simplifying things so less involved/smoother transactions, no issues etc. 

> Removing security deposits entirely would lead to lots of option trading, If I am a BTC buyer and take a trade and the market falls by 5% what incentive is their for me not to to walk away from the trade?

Besides my sense of honour & integrity? Not wanting to get blocked, or piss of a seller? (the hand that feeds me? lol). 
Nah, fair point. Why did BTC seller not put a security deposit request for buyer then? They certainly haven't thought it through. 
Clear warnings etc. would help educate. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/295#issuecomment-782443302
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210219/fac99ae2/attachment.htm>