[bisq-network/proposals] Reduce by half the min and max BTC limits to adjust fiat BTC price increase. (#295)

[pazza]

> Besides my sense of honour & integrity? 

Maybe not everyone will have the same sense of honor and integrity as you. Especially on a decentralized, somewhat anonymous platform. 

Not wanting to get blocked, or piss off a seller? (the hand that feeds me? lol).

It would be easy to just set up a new onion address. I imagine you could to this will altcoins all day long and no one would be able to stop you. Take an offer, if the price moves in the direction for you complete, if it goes against you walk away.

> Nah, fair point. Why did BTC seller not put a security deposit request for buyer then? They certainly haven't thought it through.
> Clear warnings etc. would help educate.

Yes, I think that sellers put a security deposit request for buyer. They would only have to get burnt a few times (with no deposit trades) with wasted trade fees and miner fees before they decided it wasn't worth it. That is just my opinion though, some people might have more patience and tolerance of miner fees / trade fees wastage than me!





-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/295#issuecomment-782498003
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210219/1b50d697/attachment.htm>