[bisq-network/proposals] Cap max reimbursement from peers resucrity deposit (#292)

[sqrrm]

The incentives need to be correct. For cases not caused by bugs, making it more profitable to take a case to the refund agent than accepting the mediation doesn't make sense. Starting at the mediation suggestion, assuming it's a "correct" ruling, I think the most that should be awarded is this suggestion. The party that doesn't accept the suggestion would forfeit their share.

The cost in the form of systemic risk to the Bisq DAO is rather large in the refund step and the ultimate step is to burn all the funds that can't be recovered in the mediation step and issuing refunds as the DAO deem reasonable from funds generated from fees. That's currently not even close to feasible, but it's the core of the risk model as discussed before implementation.



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/292#issuecomment-753477520
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210102/56e95272/attachment.htm>