[bisq-network/proposals] Cap max reimbursement from peers resucrity deposit (#292)

[sqrrm]

@chimp1984 those are some pretty reasonable suggestions. What I take issue with is the economic incentive to take cases to the DAO rather than the refund agent. I think it should be the opposite, we want to avoid cases going to the DAO as much as possible. Since refund agents might not want to take all cases it might in the end be better to have an equal cost for refund agent vs DAO refunds, and the easy of going through refund agent would motivate most to go that route.

I don't see the refund agent as a fully trusted role so it fits with a distributed model to have one of several of them. There's then always the backstop of the DAO as last stop arbitration but the extra time would dissuade all that can to avoid that route.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/292#issuecomment-753535064
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210102/7279c171/attachment.htm>