[bisq-network/proposals] Cap max reimbursement from peers resucrity deposit (#292)

pazza notifications at github.com
Tue Jan 5 03:00:21 CET 2021


> @pazza83 Including this cost to general trading fees is what's been done until now, but I don't think it's fair. Not all traders use arbitration and this cost is paid by those traders who cause trades to go to arbitration 

I think it is fair that arbitration is included in general fees. You never know when you will need arbitration. A user could at anytime end up in arbitration through no fault of their own. 

Do you think any specific type of traders are more likely to end in arbitration than others? Thinking markets / payment methods as opposed to poor communicators!

> Bisq should not take any profit from bugs.

Agreed


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/292#issuecomment-754335981
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210104/1bb5b6a0/attachment.htm>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list