[bisq-network/proposals] Cap max reimbursement from peers resucrity deposit (#292)

pazza notifications at github.com
Tue Jan 5 03:05:35 CET 2021


Hi @Akira45-0 thanks for the feedback. Sorry that you had a poor experience. It is frustrating when you get an unresponsive trader.

Is there an upper lower limit you would find acceptable?

If your 2 BTC trade has used a 50% deposit how much would you be wanting to claim for in arbitration? 

Likewise do you consider 15% adequate compensation for the trade?

My thoughts are that you should receive the 15% compensation as a result of the unresponsive trade as I do not think anything should be applied retrospectively. However going forward I think a cap of 7.5% is fair. What are your thoughts?

Appreciate any comments.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/292#issuecomment-754337747
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210104/f2c3e45e/attachment.htm>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list